← CAT Topics

CAT — Miscellaneous

5 questions, free to view. Click any question to see the answer and explanation.

Attempt This Topic →
Expand all
Miscellaneous
5 questions
Set 1 5 questions

Eight gymnastics players numbered 1 through 8 underwent a training camp where they were coached by three coaches - Xena, Yuki, and Zara. Each coach trained at least two players.Yuki trained only even numbered players, while Zara trained only odd numbered players. After the camp, the coaches evaluated the players and gave integer ratings to the respective players trained by them on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 being the lowest rating and 7 the highest.


The following additional information is known.

1. Xena trained more players than Yuki.

2. Player-1 and Player-4 were trained by the same coach, while the coaches who trained Player-2, Player-3 and Player-5 were all different.

3. Player-5 and Player-7 were trained by the same coach and got the same rating. All other players got a unique rating.

4. The average of the ratings of all the players was 4.

5. Player-2 got the highest rating.

6. The average of the ratings of the players trained by Yuki was twice that of the player strained by Xena and two more than that of the players trained by Zara.

7. Player-4’s rating was double of Player-8's and less than Player-5’s.

Q1 What best can be concluded about the number of players coached by Zara? MCQ

What best can be concluded about the number of players coached by Zara?

A.

Exactly 3

B.

Either 2 or 3

C.

Exactly 2

D.

Either 2 or 3 or 4

Correct answer: C.

Exactly 2

Step 1:

From conditions (3) and (4), exactly two players received the same rating.

Let the repeated rating be N.

Then,

(1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + N) / 8 = 4

⇒ N = 4

Hence, Players 5 and 7 both received a rating of 4.

Since Xena trained more players than Yuki, there are two possible distributions:

  • Possibility 1:
  • Xena trains 3 players.
  • Yuki trains 2 players.
  • Zara trains 3 players.
  • Possibility 2:
  • Xena trains 4 players.
  • Yuki trains 2 players.
  • Zara trains 2 players.

For Possibility 1,

X = 38/13, which is not an integer and is therefore not feasible.

For Possibility 2,

X = 3, which satisfies the conditions.

Thus,

  • Xena trained 4 players with an average score of 3, giving a total score of 12.
  • Yuki trained 2 players with an average score of 6, giving a total score of 12.
  • Zara trained 2 players with an average score of 4, giving a total score of 8.

Step 2:

From condition (5), Player 2 received a rating of 7.

Also, Player 4 received a rating of 2, and Player 8 received a rating of 1.

The known ratings are:

  • Player 2 → 7
  • Player 4 → 2
  • Player 5 → 4
  • Player 7 → 4
  • Player 8 → 1

Yuki trained only two players, whose ratings add up to 12.

The only possible combination is 7 and 5.

Since 7 belongs to Player 2, the rating 5 must belong to Player 6.

As Yuki trained only even-numbered players and only Player 6 remains, Players 2 and 6 must have been trained by Yuki.

Zara's trainees have a total score of 8.

This total can be obtained either as 2 + 6 or 4 + 4.

Since the rating 2 belongs to Player 4, who is even-numbered, and Zara trained only odd-numbered players, the 2 + 6 combination is not possible.

Therefore, Zara must have trained Players 5 and 7, both of whom have a rating of 4.

The remaining players—1, 3, 4, and 8—were trained by Xena.

Thus, the final assignments are:

  • Player 1 → Rating 3/6, Trained by Xena
  • Player 2 → Rating 7, Trained by Yuki
  • Player 3 → Rating 6/3, Trained by Xena
  • Player 4 → Rating 2, Trained by Xena
  • Player 5 → Rating 4, Trained by Zara
  • Player 6 → Rating 5, Trained by Yuki
  • Player 7 → Rating 4, Trained by Zara
  • Player 8 → Rating 1, Trained by Xena


Q2 What was the rating of Player-7? TITA

What was the rating of Player-7?

Answer: 4

Step 1:

From conditions (3) and (4), exactly two players received the same rating.

Let the repeated rating be N.

Then,

(1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + N) / 8 = 4

⇒ N = 4

Hence, Players 5 and 7 both received a rating of 4.

Since Xena trained more players than Yuki, there are two possible distributions:

  • Possibility 1:
  • Xena trains 3 players.
  • Yuki trains 2 players.
  • Zara trains 3 players.
  • Possibility 2:
  • Xena trains 4 players.
  • Yuki trains 2 players.
  • Zara trains 2 players.

For Possibility 1,

X = 38/13, which is not an integer and is therefore not feasible.

For Possibility 2,

X = 3, which satisfies the conditions.

Thus,

  • Xena trained 4 players with an average score of 3, giving a total score of 12.
  • Yuki trained 2 players with an average score of 6, giving a total score of 12.
  • Zara trained 2 players with an average score of 4, giving a total score of 8.

Step 2:

From condition (5), Player 2 received a rating of 7.

Also, Player 4 received a rating of 2, and Player 8 received a rating of 1.

The known ratings are:

  • Player 2 → 7
  • Player 4 → 2
  • Player 5 → 4
  • Player 7 → 4
  • Player 8 → 1

Yuki trained only two players, whose ratings add up to 12.

The only possible combination is 7 and 5.

Since 7 belongs to Player 2, the rating 5 must belong to Player 6.

As Yuki trained only even-numbered players and only Player 6 remains, Players 2 and 6 must have been trained by Yuki.

Zara's trainees have a total score of 8.

This total can be obtained either as 2 + 6 or 4 + 4.

Since the rating 2 belongs to Player 4, who is even-numbered, and Zara trained only odd-numbered players, the 2 + 6 combination is not possible.

Therefore, Zara must have trained Players 5 and 7, both of whom have a rating of 4.

The remaining players—1, 3, 4, and 8—were trained by Xena.

Thus, the final assignments are:

  • Player 1 → Rating 3/6, Trained by Xena
  • Player 2 → Rating 7, Trained by Yuki
  • Player 3 → Rating 6/3, Trained by Xena
  • Player 4 → Rating 2, Trained by Xena
  • Player 5 → Rating 4, Trained by Zara
  • Player 6 → Rating 5, Trained by Yuki
  • Player 7 → Rating 4, Trained by Zara
  • Player 8 → Rating 1, Trained by Xena


Q3 What was the rating of Player-6? TITA

What was the rating of Player-6?

Answer: 5

Step 1:

From conditions (3) and (4), exactly two players received the same rating.

Let the repeated rating be N.

Then,

(1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + N) / 8 = 4

⇒ N = 4

Hence, Players 5 and 7 both received a rating of 4.


Since Xena trained more players than Yuki, there are two possible distributions:

  • Possibility 1:
  • Xena trains 3 players.
  • Yuki trains 2 players.
  • Zara trains 3 players.
  • Possibility 2:
  • Xena trains 4 players.
  • Yuki trains 2 players.
  • Zara trains 2 players.

For Possibility 1,

X = 38/13, which is not an integer and is therefore not feasible.

For Possibility 2,

X = 3, which satisfies the conditions.

Thus,

  • Xena trained 4 players with an average score of 3, giving a total score of 12.
  • Yuki trained 2 players with an average score of 6, giving a total score of 12.
  • Zara trained 2 players with an average score of 4, giving a total score of 8.

Step 2:

From condition (5), Player 2 received a rating of 7.

Also, Player 4 received a rating of 2, and Player 8 received a rating of 1.


The known ratings are:

  • Player 2 → 7
  • Player 4 → 2
  • Player 5 → 4
  • Player 7 → 4
  • Player 8 → 1

Yuki trained only two players, whose ratings add up to 12.

The only possible combination is 7 and 5.

Since 7 belongs to Player 2, the rating 5 must belong to Player 6.

As Yuki trained only even-numbered players and only Player 6 remains, Players 2 and 6 must have been trained by Yuki.

Zara's trainees have a total score of 8.

This total can be obtained either as 2 + 6 or 4 + 4.

Since the rating 2 belongs to Player 4, who is even-numbered, and Zara trained only odd-numbered players, the 2 + 6 combination is not possible.

Therefore, Zara must have trained Players 5 and 7, both of whom have a rating of 4.

The remaining players—1, 3, 4, and 8—were trained by Xena.


Thus, the final assignments are:

  • Player 1 → Rating 3/6, Trained by Xena
  • Player 2 → Rating 7, Trained by Yuki
  • Player 3 → Rating 6/3, Trained by Xena
  • Player 4 → Rating 2, Trained by Xena
  • Player 5 → Rating 4, Trained by Zara
  • Player 6 → Rating 5, Trained by Yuki
  • Player 7 → Rating 4, Trained by Zara
  • Player 8 → Rating 1, Trained by Xena


Q4 For how many players the ratings can be determined with certainty? TITA

For how many players the ratings can be determined with certainty?

Answer: 6

Step 1:

From conditions (3) and (4), exactly two players received the same rating.

Let the repeated rating be N.

Then,

(1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + N) / 8 = 4

⇒ N = 4

Hence, Players 5 and 7 both received a rating of 4.


Since Xena trained more players than Yuki, there are two possible distributions:

  • Possibility 1:
  • Xena trains 3 players.
  • Yuki trains 2 players.
  • Zara trains 3 players.
  • Possibility 2:
  • Xena trains 4 players.
  • Yuki trains 2 players.
  • Zara trains 2 players.

For Possibility 1,

X = 38/13, which is not an integer and is therefore not feasible.

For Possibility 2,

X = 3, which satisfies the conditions.

Thus,

  • Xena trained 4 players with an average score of 3, giving a total score of 12.
  • Yuki trained 2 players with an average score of 6, giving a total score of 12.
  • Zara trained 2 players with an average score of 4, giving a total score of 8.

Step 2:

From condition (5), Player 2 received a rating of 7.

Also, Player 4 received a rating of 2, and Player 8 received a rating of 1.


The known ratings are:

  • Player 2 → 7
  • Player 4 → 2
  • Player 5 → 4
  • Player 7 → 4
  • Player 8 → 1

Yuki trained only two players, whose ratings add up to 12.

The only possible combination is 7 and 5.

Since 7 belongs to Player 2, the rating 5 must belong to Player 6.

As Yuki trained only even-numbered players and only Player 6 remains, Players 2 and 6 must have been trained by Yuki.

Zara's trainees have a total score of 8.

This total can be obtained either as 2 + 6 or 4 + 4.

Since the rating 2 belongs to Player 4, who is even-numbered, and Zara trained only odd-numbered players, the 2 + 6 combination is not possible.

Therefore, Zara must have trained Players 5 and 7, both of whom have a rating of 4.

The remaining players—1, 3, 4, and 8—were trained by Xena.


Thus, the final assignments are:

  • Player 1 → Rating 3/6, Trained by Xena
  • Player 2 → Rating 7, Trained by Yuki
  • Player 3 → Rating 6/3, Trained by Xena
  • Player 4 → Rating 2, Trained by Xena
  • Player 5 → Rating 4, Trained by Zara
  • Player 6 → Rating 5, Trained by Yuki
  • Player 7 → Rating 4, Trained by Zara
  • Player 8 → Rating 1, Trained by Xena


Q5 Who all were the players trained by Xena? MCQ

Who all were the players trained by Xena?

A.

Player-1, Player-3, Player-4

B.

Player-1, Player-3, Player-4, Player-6

C.

Player-1, Player-3, Player-4, Player-8

D.

Player-1, Player-4, Player-6, Player-8

Correct answer: C.

Player-1, Player-3, Player-4, Player-8

Step 1:

From conditions (3) and (4), exactly two players received the same rating.

Let the repeated rating be N.

Then,

(1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + N) / 8 = 4

⇒ N = 4

Hence, Players 5 and 7 both received a rating of 4.


Since Xena trained more players than Yuki, there are two possible distributions:

  • Possibility 1:
  • Xena trains 3 players.
  • Yuki trains 2 players.
  • Zara trains 3 players.
  • Possibility 2:
  • Xena trains 4 players.
  • Yuki trains 2 players.
  • Zara trains 2 players.

For Possibility 1,

X = 38/13, which is not an integer and is therefore not feasible.

For Possibility 2,

X = 3, which satisfies the conditions.

Thus,

  • Xena trained 4 players with an average score of 3, giving a total score of 12.
  • Yuki trained 2 players with an average score of 6, giving a total score of 12.
  • Zara trained 2 players with an average score of 4, giving a total score of 8.

Step 2:

From condition (5), Player 2 received a rating of 7.

Also, Player 4 received a rating of 2, and Player 8 received a rating of 1.


The known ratings are:

  • Player 2 → 7
  • Player 4 → 2
  • Player 5 → 4
  • Player 7 → 4
  • Player 8 → 1

Yuki trained only two players, whose ratings add up to 12.

The only possible combination is 7 and 5.

Since 7 belongs to Player 2, the rating 5 must belong to Player 6.

As Yuki trained only even-numbered players and only Player 6 remains, Players 2 and 6 must have been trained by Yuki.

Zara's trainees have a total score of 8.

This total can be obtained either as 2 + 6 or 4 + 4.

Since the rating 2 belongs to Player 4, who is even-numbered, and Zara trained only odd-numbered players, the 2 + 6 combination is not possible.

Therefore, Zara must have trained Players 5 and 7, both of whom have a rating of 4.

The remaining players—1, 3, 4, and 8—were trained by Xena.


Thus, the final assignments are:

  • Player 1 → Rating 3/6, Trained by Xena
  • Player 2 → Rating 7, Trained by Yuki
  • Player 3 → Rating 6/3, Trained by Xena
  • Player 4 → Rating 2, Trained by Xena
  • Player 5 → Rating 4, Trained by Zara
  • Player 6 → Rating 5, Trained by Yuki
  • Player 7 → Rating 4, Trained by Zara
  • Player 8 → Rating 1, Trained by Xena


Want this as a timed attempt?

Log in free to attempt this topic with a real timer, analytics, streaks and bookmarks.

Start Free →
💬 Talk to GRADSCALE
We usually respond within a few hours
💬
Chat with us on WhatsApp
Get instant help with your drills, subscription, or any platform questions from the GRADSCALE team.
💬 Open WhatsApp
Mon–Sat · 9 AM – 9 PM IST
Message sent! We'll get back to you within 24 hours.
Yes. GRADSCALE has a free plan with access to daily drills, streaks, and basic analytics. Pro unlocks full analytics, mock mode, PYQ practice, and priority support.
CAT 2026, IPMAT, and XAT are live. GMAT, GRE, SNAP, NMAT, JEE, NEET, SSC, Banking and more are coming soon.
No. GRADSCALE is designed to complement coaching — or work standalone. You bring the intent, GRADSCALE brings the structure and accountability.
Every day you get 3 drills — one each for VARC, DILR, and QA — with a time limit. Complete all 3 to maintain your streak.
Attempt all 3 drills together as a single timed exam — VARC → DILR → QA with section locks, exactly like the real CAT pattern.
Each drill can be attempted once — individually or as part of a mock, not both. This keeps your analytics clean and honest.
Yes. Both MCQ and TITA (Type In The Answer) questions are supported. TITA questions have no negative marking and include an on-screen keyboard when enabled.
PYQs are actual previous year question papers. You can attempt them as full papers, section-wise, or topic-wise — with per-attempt analytics and bookmarks.
Smart Mix randomises questions across multiple years for a topic, so you're not just practising one year's pattern. It gives you a broader, more realistic workout.
Prep Tools are focused skill resources — RC 111 passage bank, GRE Vocab Forge, CAT QA Formula Bank, MBA GK Flashcards and more. Launching soon.
A streak counts consecutive days you've completed all 3 daily drills. Miss one day and it resets to zero. It's designed to build the habit of daily execution.
Section-wise accuracy, time per question, weak topic identification, weekly performance trends, PYQ attempt history, and your streak calendar.
Yes. The leaderboard shows daily and all-time streak rankings. You can see where you stand among all active aspirants on the platform.
Yes. Google Sign-In is supported for quick registration and login — no password required.
Go to the Subscription page from the navbar or click "Upgrade" on your dashboard. Monthly and yearly plans are available.
Full refund within 7 days of purchase if you're not satisfied. See www.gradscale.in/refund/ for details.
Click "Forgot password" on the login page and enter your email. You'll get a reset link within a few minutes.